Portch v. Sommerville
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.
— Jason and Tami Portch appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion for a new trial. The motion was based on their contention that the trial court denied them the opportunity to exercise any of their peremptory challenges during jury selection. We agree they were denied the opportunity to exercise their peremptory challenges but find their refusal of the court’s offer to declare a mistrial renders the error harmless. The court’s denial of a new trial is affirmed, and the Portches’ request for attorney fees is denied.
Facts
The Portches sued Heather Sommerville for negligence arising from a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. LindenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Estate of Lapping v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget SoundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- State v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Colley v. PeaceHealthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Portch v. SommervilleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- In re the Detention of RogersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Maytown Sand And Gravel, Resp/cross-app v. Thurston County, App/cross-respCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- In Re RogersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.