Legal Opinion
Portch v. Sommerville
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 8, 2002No. 20690-4-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
55 P.3d 661 (2002)
113 Wash.App. 807
Jason PORTCH and Tami Portch, husband and wife, Appellants,
v.
Heather SOMMERVILLE and John Doe Sommerville, wife and husband, Respondents.
No. 20690-4-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Three.
October 8, 2002.
Gregory G. Staeheli, Anna M. Cutler, Kain, Snow & Staeheli, Spokane, WA, for Appellants.
Patrick G. McMahon, Carlson & McMahon, Wenatchee, WA, for Respondents.
SCHULTHEIS, J.
Jason and Tami Portch appeal the trial court's denial of their motion for a new trial. The motion was based on their contention that the trial court denied them the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. LindenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Estate of Lapping v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget SoundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Mentor v. KingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Colley v. PeaceHealthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- In re the Detention of RogersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Maytown Sand And Gravel, Resp/cross-app v. Thurston County, App/cross-respCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- In Re RogersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State Of Washington, V Richard Wayne BlairCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018