Legal Opinion

Maytown Sand And Gravel, Resp/cross-app v. Thurston County, App/cross-resp

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 4, 2017No. 46895-6-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMelnick, J.

¶1 Thurston County (County) appeals the trial court’s orders denying its motions for summary judgment, judgment as a matter of law, and for a new trial, and the jury’s verdict in favor of Maytown Sand and Gravel, LLC (MSG) and the Port of Tacoma (the Port). Maytown’s lawsuit against the County involved claims for tortious interference, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, and a violation of substantive due process 2 arising out of the County’s interference with MSG’s ability to begin gravel mining on property MSG had purchased from the Port. We conclude that the trial court did not err…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Shanks v. DresselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maytown Sand & Gravel, LLC v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State Of Washington v. Layne E. HuberCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API