Legal Opinion

In re the Detention of Rogers

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 17, 2003No. 20181-3-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

A person civilly committed under the sexually violent predator statute is entitled to an annual review of his or her mental condition. Former RCW 71.09.070 (1995). The annual review must consider conditional release or a less restrictive alternative. And if the committed person so requests, the “court may appoint a qualified expert” to assist in the determination. Former RCW 71.09.070. Here, the court refused to appoint an expert for Keith Rogers’ annual review because the court believed that he had not shown any improvement from earlier evaluations. We conclude that the trial court abused…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In Re Detention of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Jason ShirtsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. In Re RogersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API