Legal Opinion
State v. Williamson
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 11, 2000No. 17521-9-IIIPublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
996 P.2d 1097 (2000)
100 Wash.App. 248
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Michael Lee WILLIAMSON, Appellant.
No. 17521-9-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Eight.
April 11, 2000.
Paul J. Wasson, Spokane, for Appellant.
Lauri M. Boyd, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, Yakima, for Respondent.
SWEENEY, J.
In this prosecution for kidnapping and attempted first degree murder, Michael Williamson claims that he was denied a fair trial because the court allowed the State to exercise an unused peremptory challenge after the jury had been sworn and after the State's first witness had started to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. StraussWashington Supreme Court · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. NealWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. NealWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. OhlsonWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.