Legal Opinion
In Re Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 9, 2009No. 07-4264PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Cooper Tire & Rubber Company (“Cooper”) seeks a writ of mandamus directing the district court to vacate its discovery order and requiring the district court, on remand, to apply the provisions of Rule 26(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Specifically, Cooper asserts that the district court erred in not applying the proper standards regarding the scope of relevant information for purposes of discovery, the calculation of whether the requested discovery posed an undue burden, and the determination of whether trade secrets should be revealed. Reviewing…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Benavidez v. Sandia National LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
- Layne Christensen Co. v. Purolite Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2010
- Rosas v. Alice's Tea Cup, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- In re Onglyza (Saxagliptin) and Kombiglyze (Saxagliptin and Metformin) Prods. Liability Litig.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.