Legal Opinion

Layne Christensen Co. v. Purolite Co.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 28, 2010No. Civil Action No. 09-2381-JWL-GLRPublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GERALD L. RUSHFELT, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order (doc. 37). It seeks a protective order, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 26(c), to limit the disclosure of confidential information produced during discovery in this patent infringement and breach of contract case. The parties agree that a protective order should be entered, but they disagree about its scope and some of its *243provisions. Specifically, they disagree whether a two-tier protective order is appropriate, which would allow the parties to designate some…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Federal Open Market Committee of Federal Reserve System v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Lawrence S. Bittaker v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, California State Prison of San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. In Re Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Krueger v. Grinnell Mut. Reinsurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Nelson v. HardacreDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2016
  3. A. v. United Healthcare InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023
  4. A. v. United Healthcare InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023
  5. Ad Astra Recovery Services, Inc. v. HeathDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API