Legal Opinion

In Re the Personal Restraint of Carrier

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 2012No. 83377-0PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

¶1 Harry Carrier filed this untimely personal restraint petition asserting that his mandatory life sentence under the “two strikes” provision of the Persistent Offender Accountability Act (POAA) of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA), chapter 9.94A RCW, is invalid. He contends that the trial court erroneously counted a dismissed conviction from 1981 as one of the strikes. The commissioner denied review because Carrier’s judgment and sentence does not itself indicate that the 1981 conviction was dismissed. We granted Carrier’s motion to modify and accepted review. We conclude that the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of GoodwinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. DelgadoWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. VargaWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. VargaWashington Supreme Court · 2004

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Loeffelholz v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. ScherfWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Hambleton v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of Toledo-SoteloWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of SnivelyWashington Supreme Court · 2014

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API