In re the Personal Restraint of Snively
Washington Supreme Court
1Per curiam
¶1 In In re Personal Restraint of Adams, 178 Wn.2d 417, 309 P.3d 451 (2013), we held that a facially invalid judgment and sentence does not create a broad exception permitting a personal restraint petitioner to assert a claim that is otherwise not exempt from the one-year limit on collateral review under RCW 10.73.100. Here, the Court of Appeals allowed Garth Snively to withdraw his plea of guilty to indecent liberties because of a facially invalid sentence. Because Snively’s sole remedy for the sentencing error is correction of the judgment and sentence, we reverse the Court of Appeals as to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In re the Personal Restraint of CoatsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- In re the Personal Restraint of IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Personal Restraint of FinstadWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. MendozaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In re the Detention of ReyesWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- In re the Personal Restraint of YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. WheelerWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. KellyWashington Supreme Court · 2024
- State of Washington v. Olajide Adel FletcherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.