Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Snively

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2014No. 84753-3PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

¶1 In In re Personal Restraint of Adams, 178 Wn.2d 417, 309 P.3d 451 (2013), we held that a facially invalid judgment and sentence does not create a broad exception permitting a personal restraint petitioner to assert a claim that is otherwise not exempt from the one-year limit on collateral review under RCW 10.73.100. Here, the Court of Appeals allowed Garth Snively to withdraw his plea of guilty to indecent liberties because of a facially invalid sentence. Because Snively’s sole remedy for the sentencing error is correction of the judgment and sentence, we reverse the Court of Appeals as to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of CoatsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of FinstadWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. MendozaWashington Supreme Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In re the Detention of ReyesWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. WheelerWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. KellyWashington Supreme Court · 2024
  5. State of Washington v. Olajide Adel FletcherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API