Legal Opinion

Hambleton v. Department of Revenue

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 2014No. Nos. 89419-1; 89500-7PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

f 1 In 2013, the legislature amended the Estate and Transfer Tax Act, chapter 83.100 RCW, in response to our decision in In re Estate of Bracken, 175 Wn.2d 549, 290 P.3d 99 (2012), in which we narrowly-construed the term “transfer.” The amendment allows the Department of Revenue (DOR) to tax qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) as part of a surviving spouse’s estate. A QTIP trust is created by a deceased spouse and gives the surviving spouse a life interest in the income or use of trust property. See 26 U.S.C. § 2056(b)(7)(B)(i)-(ii). The advantage of QTIP trusts is that no estate…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Association of Washington Spirits & Wine Distributors v. Washington State Liquor Control BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Cornelius v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Lenander v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  4. City of Seattle v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Dot Foods, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2016

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API