Legal Opinion
Garcia v. City of South Tucson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 3, 1983No. 2 CA-CIV 4479PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
Appellees filed this special action sounding in mandamus against the City of South Tucson seeking enforcement of a tort judgment for personal injuries entered against the city. Garcia v. City of South Tucson, 131 Ariz. 315, 640 P.2d 1117 (App.1981).
The city answered the special action, admitting (1) the judgment and amount; (2) its affirmance on appeal; (3) the duty of the city officials to pay the debts and expenses of the city, subject to statutory and constitutional regulations; (4) the power of the city officials to assess for payment of the city’s debts, subject to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- May v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Garcia v. City of South TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Lewis v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Bilagody v. ThorneycroftCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Town of Flagstaff v. GomezArizona Supreme Court · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Forszt v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Ray v. DownesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Larkin v. State Ex Rel. RottasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Callan v. BerniniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Adler v. Lincoln Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.