Legal Opinion

Forszt v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 15, 2006No. 2 CA-CV 2005-0216PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Plaintiffs/appellants Gregg Forszt and Vestar Arizona, XLI, L.L.C., appeal from the trial court’s denial of a writ of mandamus and declaratory judgment compelling defendant/appellee F. Ann Rodriguez, the Pima County Recorder, to disqualify the signature sheets filed by intervenor Stop O.V. Outrageous Giveaways (SOVOG) requesting a referendum election in the Town of Oro Valley. Because we conclude the trial court correctly denied the relief requested, we affirm its ruling. 1

¶2 The facts relevant to this appeal are not in dispute. On April 7, 2004, the Town of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Western Devcor, Inc. v. City of ScottsdaleArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Direct Sellers Association v. McBrayerArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Washburn v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. Pioneer Trust Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Cottonwood Development v. Foothills Area Coalition of Tucson, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. White Mountain Health Center, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  2. Harris v. City of BisbeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. Debra Arrett and Shirley Lamonna v. Julie K. BowerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  4. Advanced Cardiac Specialists, Chartered v. Tri-City Cardiology Consultants, P.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Rasor v. Northwest Hospital, LLC Dba Northwest Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API