Legal Opinion

Larkin v. State Ex Rel. Rottas

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 8, 1993No. 1 CA-TX 91-006PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Presiding Judge.

The State of Arizona and Richard Beis-sel, the state’s General Accountant, appeal from a tax court judgment that awarded the following sums as attorney’s fees in post-judgment proceedings in a tax refund action: (1) $24,238.00 against the state pursuant to Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) section 12-348; (2) $3,812.00 against the state pursuant to A.R.S. section 12-349; and (3) $1,500.00 against Beissel personally as a sanction for willfully disobeying a court order. The appellee taxpayers cross-appeal from the judgment to the extent it declined to award them…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Taylor v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Maricopa County v. Corporation Commission of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1955

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. John C. Lincoln Hospital v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Kadish v. Arizona State Land DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  3. Lewis v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  4. Dunn v. DunnMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Davis v. Cessna Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API