Legal Opinion
In Re Spiridon
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 13, 2000No. 96-BG-1409PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
Respondent was convicted in Maryland of misdemeanor theft of eighteen dollars. The Board on Professional Responsibility (Board) recommends that he be suspended for one year, with a requirement to show fitness before reinstatement pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 16 (2000). The Board unanimously concluded, as had the Hearing Committee, that respondent violated Rule 8.4(b) of the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct, but did not commit an “offense involving moral turpitude” within the meaning of D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (1995). Bar Counsel takes exception and urges that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Matter of ColsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re McBrideDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Matter of KentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re SoininenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re PattersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re TidwellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In re JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- In Re BewigDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.