Legal Opinion

In Re Bewig

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 2002No. 99-BG-112PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter is before the court on the recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility (the “Board”) to disbar respondent pursuant to D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (1995) for conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude. Respondent pled guilty in the Superior Court to misdemeanor sexual contact in violation of D.C.Code § 22-4106 (1996). Respondent’s conviction was reported to this court, and on March 15, 1999, we issued an order setting forth our conclusion that the misdemeanor did not constitute a “serious crime” as defined by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 10(b). 1 The order referred the matter to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. In Re SpiridonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against DayWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DayWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. In Re SimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. In Re SimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API