Legal Opinion
In re Johnson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 12, 2012No. 11-BG-1224PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) recommends that respondent Jack Bruce Johnson be disbarred pursuant to D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (2001) because he has been convicted of two *172crimes of moral turpitude.1 We adopt the Board’s unopposed recommendation.
Mr. Johnson has been a member of the District of Columbia Bar since March 13, 1981. On May 17, 2011, in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Mr. Johnson pled guilty to attempted extortion under the color of official right, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951, and attempted witness and evidence tampering, in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Matter of ColsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Matter of ShorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Matter of ShillaireDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Re SpiridonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Charles E. Mobley, Dante Carpenter, Gerald A. Thompkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Grady W. Hailstock v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In re FarrenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- In the Matter of Peter J. Cammarano, III, an Attorney at LawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
- In re Matthew KlugerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.