Legal Opinion

Myears v. Charles Mix County

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1997No. NonePublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Before suing a public entity, written notice must be given to certain officials within 180 days of injury. Ernest Myears failed to advise the requisite public officers before he sued Charles Mix County. Nonetheless, within the mandatory period, Myears notified the county engineer, who in turn informed other county officials, and a claims adjuster investigated. Will substantial compliance satisfy statutory notice requirements? We answer yes and reverse summary judgment for the county, finding these circumstances adequate to establish reasonable compliance.

Facts

[¶2.]…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Pickering v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Woodsmall v. Regional Transportation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Vermeer Ex Rel. Vermeer v. SnellerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  4. Morgan v. BaldwinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Ward v. LangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. DiCampli-Mintz v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Peterson v. HohmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Loesch v. City of HuronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Purdy v. FlemingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Thompson v. E.I.G. Palace Mall, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API