Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Hohm
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Ruby Peterson (Ruby) appeals the circuit court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of Robert C. Hohm, Paul Hohm, Tschetter & Hohm Clinic, and Knute Landreth (Doctors). We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] On March 22, 1995, Edward Peterson (Edward), who was sixty years old, went to the Tschetter and Hohm Clinic in Huron, South Dakota, complaining of headaches, nausea, vomiting and neck stiffness. He received a CT Scan of his head, was treated by Doctors at the clinic and released. On April 3, 1995, Edward suffered an undiagnosed cerebral hemorrhage that caused him to collapse.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Galligan v. Westfield Centre Service, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- City of Colton v. SchwebachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Negron v. LlarenaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Strassburg v. Citizens State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Chipperfield v. WoessnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Peterson, Ex Rel. Peterson v. BurnsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Thurman v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Gerald P. Pecoraro v. The Diocese of Rapid City, a South Dakota Nonprofit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- One Star v. Sisters of St. FrancisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Dakota Truck Underwriters v. South Dakota Subsequent Injury FundSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.