Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

General Portland, Inc. v. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Air Pollution Control Board

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 2, 1976PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARROTT, Presiding Judge (E.S.)

Purportedly acting pursuant to the Tennessee Air Quality Act (T.C.A. 53-3408— 53-3422) and particularly T.C.A. 53-3422, the County Council of Hamilton County enacted the Hamilton County Air Pollution Control Regulation. The purpose of the regulation as stated in Section 1-B is “to provide a program of air pollution prevention, abatement, and control.”

This regulation created the Chattanooga-Hamilton County Air Pollution Control Board and a Bureau of Air Pollution Control. The administration of the air pollution control regulation is the overall duty and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boyce v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  2. West v. CarrTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State ex rel. Loser v. National Optical Stores Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Pharr v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  5. State v. MurrayTennessee Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wayne County v. Tennessee Solid Waste Disposal Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Transportation v. Medicine Bird Black Bear White EagleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  3. Edwards v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Faust v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  5. Madison Loan & Thrift Co. v. NeffCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API