State v. Murray

OPINION

CHATTIN, Justice.

Defendant-in-error was indicted for the alleged violation of T.C.A. Section 39-1957.

The indictment reads, in part, as follows :

“That James Robert Murray late of the County aforesaid, heretofore, to-wit: on the - day of June, A.D. 1968, before the finding of this indictment, in the County aforesaid, being debtor in possession of consumer goods, subject to a security interest, as defined under the Uniform Commercial Code, secured *356transactions, to-wit: One (1) Buick automobile valued in excess of One Hundred & No/100 Dollars, ($100.00) Dollars sold to said debtor, under a…