Legal Opinion

Pharr v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1948PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil

The sole question for our determination on this appeal involves the authority of the Railroad & Public Utilities Commission of the State to order the abandonment by the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway of a *157“team track” in the City of Paris, Tennessee, and requiring it to he located elsewhere.

The Commission claims to have exercised its authority - by virtue of Code, Secs. 5449 and 5450 and Chapter 130 of the Public Acts of 1939. We will refer to the parties, Railroad & Public Utilities Commission as the ‘ ‘ Commission,” and Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway as the “Railway”…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Malone v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  3. City of Detroit v. Detroit & Howell Plank Road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Reelfoot Lake Levee District v. DawsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Louisville & Nashville Terminal Co. v. LellyettTennessee Supreme Court · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Tennessee Board of DentistryTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Colonial Pipeline Co. v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  3. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. GreerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  4. Farris v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Tennessee Cable Television Ass'n v. Tennessee Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API