Legal Opinion

Faust v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 3, 2006PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM B. CAIN, J.

delivered the

opinion of the court,

in which WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., P.J., M.S., joined. PATRICIA J. COTTRELL, J. did not participate.

This case involves eligibility for enhanced retirement benefits of certain employees of a local government. In 1996, civilian employees of the police department sued alleging that an administrative interpretation of eligibility requirements that allowed civilian employees of the fire department into the enhanced benefits plan available only to “firemen” and “policemen” deprived the police department civilian employees of their rights to…

2Cases cited87 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Mississippi University for Women v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Heckler v. MathewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Mike Allmand v. Jon PavleticTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Edwards v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Jacks v. City of Millington Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
  4. Friedmann v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
  5. Freebery v. CoonsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API