Legal Opinion
Denis v. Perfect Parts, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 2, 1956No. Civ. A. 55-911PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, District Judge.
In this action for patent infringement defendant moves to quash the service, and moves to dismiss for improper venue. Defendant is a New York corporation dealing in auto parts and accessories. It has no employees, in the ordinary sense, in Massachusetts. It has a “sales representative” living in Greater Boston, hereinafter called salesman. Salesman solicits orders, on commission only. All orders are subject to acceptance in New York, and are filled from there. Salesman represents other companies in addition to defendant, and represents defendant in several other…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Lone Star Package Car Co., Inc. v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Suttle v. Reich Bros. Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Remington Rand, Inc. v. Knapp-Monarch CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co. v. Barnes, JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- In the Matter of Union Leader CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
- Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1975
- PPS, Inc. v. Jewelry Sales Representatives, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Brevel Products Corp. v. H & B AMERICAN CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.