Legal Opinion
State v. Taylor
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 4, 2005No. AC 25250PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The defendant, Thaddeus Taylor, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion, captioned “Motion for Correction of Illegal Sentence.” In his motion, the defendant asserted that he was (1) improperly deprived of his right to participate in the presentence investigation report (PSI) prepared for his sentencing in 1997, (2) improperly denied a continuance to participate properly in the preparation of the PSI and (3) not provided with a copy of the PSI in a timely manner. The defendant sought, as relief in his motion, a “reconvening” of the presentence investiga*790t…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Cobham v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. McNellisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Peters v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. CasianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. CharlesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. TaboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.