Legal Opinion
Shellman v. Hershey
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 7, 1916No. Civ. No. 1568PublishedCited by 11 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an action commenced hy plaintiffs to recover damages for an injury suffered by plaintiff Nancy Shellman in passing out through a doorway of the Woodland Opera House owned by defendants, the Hersheys, and under lease to defendants Henry and Giesea. The cause was tried by the court without the aid of a jury, and plaintiff had judgment for two thousand dollars and costs of suit.
Defendants, the Hersheys, moved for a new trial which was denied. They appeal from the order. Defendants Henry and Giesea appeal from the judgment on a separate transcript No. 1569, but do not appeal from the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Owings v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1856
- Kalis v. ShattuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dennis v. City of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Ellis v. McNeeseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Meloy v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Midland Oil Co. v. ThigpenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Slyter v. Clinton Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.