Legal Opinion

Kalis v. Shattuck

California Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1886No. 8607PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.

Pauline Kalis, the wife of her co-plaintiff, while passing along the sidewalk in front of a building on the west side of Broadway, in the city of Oakland, received personal injuries from the fall of a wooden awning, which extended, with a slanting direction, from the second story of the building for about twenty feet over the sidewalk; and to recover damages for the injuries sustained, she brought the action in hand against “ F. K. Shattuck, Maria Hillegas (administratrix of the estate of William Hillegas, deceased),” and seven other defendants, “ for knowingly, negligently, and carelessly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mullen v. . St. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Swords v. . EdgarNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Bellows v. SackettNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Leonard v. StorerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  5. Southbridge Savings Bank v. Exeter Machine WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Higgins v. L.A. Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Simms v. KennedySupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. Texas Loan Agency v. FlemingTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Chee v. Amanda Goldt Property ManagementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Rider v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API