Legal Opinion

City of Phoenix v. Harlan

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1953No. 5583PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court granting a motion for new trial after verdicts and judgment in favor of the defendant. The parties to this litiga tion are before us in the reverse order of their appearance in the trial court, -but for convenience reference will be made to them herein as they there appeared, viz., Ray Harlan et al., as plaintiffs, and the City of Phoenix, as defendant.

Eleven different groups of plaintiffs joined in one complaint against the City of Phoenix, a municipal corporation, complaining of the use made of the newly constructed east-west…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Delta Air Corporation v. KerseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Thrasher v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Susquehanna Fertilizer Co. v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  4. King v. Columbian Carbon Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  5. Southern Arizona Freight Lines, Ltd. v. JacksonArizona Supreme Court · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Armory Park Neighborhood Ass'n v. Episcopal Community ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Adroit Supply Co. v. Electric Mutual Liability InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  3. General Petroleum Corp. v. BarkerArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Pima County v. BilbyArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Tucker v. CollarArizona Supreme Court · 1955

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API