Legal Opinion

Ray v. Moxon

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 4, 1933No. 3937PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

For convenience the parties to this appeal will carry the same designation as in the trial court.

Plaintiff Le Roy Moxon, by next friend, brought suit against E. E. Ray and the Commercial Standard Insurance Company, defendants, for damages. The substance of his cause of action against Ray was that said Ray had negligently struck the motorcycle on which he was riding on the Bankhead Highway near the town of Big Spring, with his automobile, inflicting physical injuries not necessary here to set out.

For cause of action against the other defendant herein, plaintiff alleged: "That defendant,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Small Ex Rel. Balthis v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. American Indemnity Co. v. FellbaumTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Connolly v. BolsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  4. Clark v. Bonsal & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Frye v. Bath Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Grasso v. Cannon Ball Motor Freight LinesTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Kuntz v. SpenceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
  3. National Surety Corporation v. DiggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. ShuddeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. L. Moxon v. E. E. RayTexas Supreme Court · 1935

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API