Legal Opinion

Kuntz v. Spence

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 24, 1934No. 1705—6229PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRITZ, Judge.

This suit was filed in the district court of Wichita county, Tex., by Sam B. Spence and wife, against J. Earl Kuntz and wife, and Employers’ Casualty Company, a corporation, to recover damages for the death of Toy Spence, minor child of the Spences, alleged to have resulted from the negligent operation of an automobile by Mrs. Kuntz, and which belonged to the Kuntzes. The basis of the action against the Kuntzes is for tort. The casualty company is attempted to be held on an insurance policy issued by it to J. Earl Kuntz covering the car in question here. Trial in the district…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Small Ex Rel. Balthis v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. American Indemnity Co. v. FellbaumTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Connolly v. BolsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  4. Clark v. Bonsal & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Frye v. Bath Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Barrington v. DuncanTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. El Paso Field Services, L.P. and Gulfterra South Texas, L.P. F/K/A El Paso South Texas, L.P. v. Mastec North America, Inc. and Mastec, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Grasso v. Cannon Ball Motor Freight LinesTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Celanese Corp. Of America v. John Clark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  5. Utilities Ins. Co. v. MontgomeryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1940

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API