Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control v. City of Indio
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GAUT, J.
1. Introduction
Do cross-complaints filed in response to a reverse validation action 1 survive after the primary action has been dismissed because of lack of jurisdiction for failure to serve it properly? 2 We hold that that jurisdiction over the cross-complaints was never completed and they should also be dismissed.
2. Factual and Procedural Background
On November 29, 1999, the City of Indio enlarged the Indio Merged Redevelopment Project Area by adopting Ordinance No. 1260. On January 26, 2000, plaintiff Coachella Valley Water District (Water District) filed a reverse validation…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Harrington v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Planning and Conservation League v. Department of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Embarcadero Municipal Improvement District v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Conservatorship of Kevin M.California Court of Appeal · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Westamerica Bank v. Mbg Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Katz v. Campbell Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Dameron Hospital Assoc. v. GEICO Indemnity Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Dameron Hospital Assoc. v. Geico General Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Toy v. City & County of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.