Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Embarcadero Municipal Improvement District v. County of Santa Barbara

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 2001No. B141893PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COFFEE, J.

Defendant County of Santa Barbara (County) approved a resort hotel development on a 73-acre beachfront parcel north of the City of Santa Barbara. The parcel is within the boundaries of plaintiff Embarcadero Municipal Improvement District (EMID). The County conditioned its approval of the hotel on the annexation of the parcel to two other special districts, defendants Goleta West Sanitary District (Sanitary District) and Santa Barbara Metropolitan Transit District (Transit District). The annexation could only go forward if the County and the affected districts agreed to an…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Carsten v. Psychology Examining CommitteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State Water Resources Control Board CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. American Master Lease LLC v. Idanta Partners, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Kaatz v. CITY OF SEASIDECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Barratt American, Inc. v. City of Rancho CucamongaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. McLeod v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API