Legal Opinion

Thomas v. American B. & L. Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 7, 1934No. 11752PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOND, Justice.

The record and statement of facts only were filed in this ease. There are no assignments of error and no brief filed for plaintiff in error. Thus, it is within the discretion of this court to examine the record and statement of facts and, if no fundamental error is apparent, to affirm the judgment. Haynes v. Radford Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W. (2d) 811.

The record discloses that the judgment rendered by the lower court was on agreement ; therefore, all errors committed before its rendition, not going to the court’s jurisdiction, are waived, and this court will not take notice of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haynes v. J. F. Radford Grocery CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Posey v. Plains Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Hubbard v. Trinity State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alexander v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. Federal Underwriters Exchange v. HustedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API