Legal Opinion

Federal Underwriters Exchange v. Husted

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 20, 1936No. 1533PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Justice.

No brief for plaintiff in error has been filed in this cause. Its brief was mailed to the clerk of this court long after the time provided by law for its filing. Although notified that its brief had been received but not filed, no good cause or excuse of any kind has .ever been offered to exjplain the delay and no request has been presented for filing it out of time. Defendant in error has filed his motion for affirmance of the judgment. Under this situation, it is our duty to affirm the judgment of the trial court, unless, upon inspection of the record, fundamental error is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Powers's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Lloyds Casualty Co. v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Brown v. SpectorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Grissom v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Hinckley-Tandy Leather Co. v. HazlewoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Petrafeck v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. CobbCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  4. Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Koonce v. City of MesquiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API