Legal Opinion

Haynes v. J. F. Radford Grocery Company

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1929No. 5180PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Judge HARVEY

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

Certified questions from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Eleventh District. The facts upon which the questions are predicated are thus stated in the certificate :

“The above case has been submitted and is before us for disposition. The appeal was perfected by the filing of a supersedeas bond which may, of course, have the effect of making a judgment of affirmance in this court of more value to the appellee than the judgment of the trial court. The case comes to us upon a transcript' and statements of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rio Grande Railroad v. City of BrownsvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Bowman v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  3. Gant v. Timmons & DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Pearson v. Household Sewing Machine Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Dickson v. DicksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Brown v. SpectorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Hotel & Restaurant Employees' International Alliance & Bartenders' International League of America v. LongleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Hardy v. City of ThrockmortonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Wagstaff v. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API