Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Trinity State Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 25, 1932No. 9657PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

The facts underlying the cause, as presented here, are thought to be correctly reflected in these recitations (copied except as to immaterial details) from the brief of defendants in error:

“In this ease, consolidated cause, Trinity State Bank, D. D. Eastham and the Estate of W. A. Eastham, m c. m., Byrde E. Wootters, guardian, were plaintiffs and the heirs at law of Lewis Hubbard and Victoria Hubbard were defendants. Judgment was entered by agreement on May 9, 1930, in term-time at a regular term of said Court, in favor of said plaintiffs and against said defendants, the ease having been…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cannon v. HemphillTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Milam County v. RobertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HaynesTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. McKean v. ZillerTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Dwyer v. NolanWashington Supreme Court · 1905

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Swift & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  2. Blume v. Shadyacres Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Thomas v. American B. & L. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API