State v. Sargent
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C.J.
Defendant appeals from his kidnapping conviction under 13 V.S.A. § 2401, repealed by 1989, No. 293 (Adj. Sess.), § 8. * He contends that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury on the intent required for conviction under § 2401. We agree, and reverse and remand for a new trial.
The trial court’s instructions on intent were as follows:
[T]he State must prove that Mr. Sargent intended to confine Meg Howard. In this regard the State must prove either, one, that Mr. Sargent consciously desired to physically confine Meg Howard against her will, or, second, Mr. Sargent knew or should have…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. DoucetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- State v. AlpertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
- State v. AudetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- State v. MoffittSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. PercySupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- State v. FangerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- State v. BolioSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- State v. TrombleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- State v. Kent Richland, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.