Legal Opinion

State v. Trombley

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 2, 2002No. 01-128PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant Matthew Trombley appeals his aggravated assault conviction, claiming several errors in the court’s jury instructions. Defendant contends that (1) the court improperly instructed the jury to consider whether defendant acted either “purposely” or “knowingly” when defendant was charged with only “purposely” inflicting serious bodily harm, (2) the court failed to instruct the jury that it should consider evidence of defendant’s fear and emotions in deciding whether defendant acted purposely, and (3) the court’s instructions on self-defense were so misleading that the jury rejected…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  4. State v. KinneySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  5. State v. DoucetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. HatcherTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. YohSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  3. State v. SextonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  4. State v. Kent Richland, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  5. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API