Legal Opinion
State v. Kent Richland, Jr.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided September 18, 2015No. 2014-196PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
Dooley, J.
Defendant Kent Richland appeals his conviction for enabling the consumption of alcohol by a minor in violation of 7 V.S.A. § 658(a)(2), following a jury trial in Chittenden Superior Court, and the probation conditions imposed by the court at sentencing. We reverse the trial court’s holding with respect to the knowledge requirement of § 658(a)(2) and remand for a new trial. Because of our disposition on the conviction, we do not reach defendant’s challenges to the probation conditions.
¶ 2. The testimony presented at trial demonstrates the following basic facts. On May 10, 2013,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Flores-Figueroa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State v. DenbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- United States v. Dwane WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Committee to Save the Bishop's House, Inc. v. Medical Center Hospital of Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- State v. StanislawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Reed Doyle v. City of Burlington Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- State v. Jeffrey DavisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- State v. Rebekah S. VanBurenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- State v. Robert WithamSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- State v. Christopher SullivanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.