Legal Opinion

State v. Moffitt

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 19, 1991No. 89-517PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

In this appeal from a conviction for selling a stolen rifle, we reverse and remand for a new trial because the court erroneously instructed the jury on the element of knowledge.

Defendant was charged under 13 V.S.A. § 2561(b), making it a crime for a person to sell stolen property “knowing the same to be stolen.” The court charged the jury, in effect, that knowledge is proved if defendant should have known, given all the facts and circumstances, that the property was stolen.

The court instructed:

The fact in issue is whether the defendant knew the rifle was stolen. The State doesn’t have to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. AlpertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  2. State v. GuppySupreme Court of Vermont · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SargentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression v. DeanDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2002
  3. State v. VuleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. State v. VuleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API