Legal Opinion

State v. Thorson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 2003No. 20020212PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] David Thorson appealed from a judgment of conviction on two class B felony charges of gross sexual imposition. We hold the State’s failure to provide Thorson a copy of the form 960 report of suspected child abuse which was filed with the Department of Human Services was not reversible obvious error, and we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Thorson was charged with two counts of committing gross sexual imposition in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-20-03 for two separate incidents of engaging in sexual contact with his girlfriend’s nine- year-old daughter. The first incident occurred in April…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. City of Grand Forks v. RamstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. GouletNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. YinemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. SieversNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BecirajNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. LougheadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. MuhleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. CharetteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. HornNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API