State v. Yineman
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Kenneth Yineman appealed from a Morton County District Court criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted *651Yineman of leaving the scene of a traffic accident. Yineman contends the State did not produce evidence sufficient to support his conviction. The State, however, argues there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction, or, in the alternative, the State asserts Yineman failed to preserve the issue for appeal by not making a motion for a judgment of acquittal under N.D.R.Crim.P. 29(a). We affirm.
[¶ 2] A Morton County deputy sheriff was notified of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Quentin Ira LincolnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- State v. KringstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. Bernard J. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- State v. HimmerickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. RourkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. DahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. StudhorseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. RogersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BarendtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.