Legal Opinion

State v. Loughead

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2007No. 20060160PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Kenneth Loughead appeals from a judgment entered after a bench trial for failing to properly tag a big game animal. We conclude Loughead’s constitutional rights were not violated, and he did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm the district court.

I

[¶ 2] In November 2005, Game Warden Ken Skuza received an anonymous RAP (Report All Poaching) tip concerning a deer that was shot and not immediately tagged in McHenry County. The tipster noted the deer was located in a red Dodge pickup belonging to Loughead’s hunting partner. Skuza located the pickup and…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. SkarsgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Steen v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Moore v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Erickson v. RubeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. BachmeierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API