State v. Loughead
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Kenneth Loughead appeals from a judgment entered after a bench trial for failing to properly tag a big game animal. We conclude Loughead’s constitutional rights were not violated, and he did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm the district court.
I
[¶ 2] In November 2005, Game Warden Ken Skuza received an anonymous RAP (Report All Poaching) tip concerning a deer that was shot and not immediately tagged in McHenry County. The tipster noted the deer was located in a red Dodge pickup belonging to Loughead’s hunting partner. Skuza located the pickup and…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. SkarsgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Steen v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Moore v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Erickson v. RubeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. BachmeierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.