Legal Opinion

Carlson Bros. v. Weidauer & Lansdown Shingle Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1912No. 10274PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Bell, J., entered December 3, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, after a trial to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

The only issue presented on this appeal is whether the sale of certain shingles was made by plaintiff to the Weidauer & Lansdown Shingle Company, or to the Weidauer & Lansdown Company, another corporation. A careful reading of the testimony convinces us that it would have been incumbent on us to follow the findings of the trial judge whichever way he decided the truth to be. We shall not, therefore, review the facts, or comment thereon, except in so far as it may be necessary to illustrate the only question of law occurring in the record. - v

*162The bulk of the shingles was sold on the written…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moon Bros. Carriage Co. v. DevenishWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Merrill v. O'BryanWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Walsh v. CooperWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blenz v. FogleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Olson v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Vickerman v. KappWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Tahoma Finance Co. v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API