Legal Opinion
Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of Bellevue
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 1, 1997No. Nos. 62941-2; 62939-1; 62940-4PublishedCited by 168 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.
At issue in this case are provisions of a Bellevue City ordinance regulating adult cabarets. Two adult entertainment corporations and three dancers (Respondents) challenged the constitutionality of the ordinance under both the First Amendment and Wash. Const, art. I, § 5. The trial court upheld all but one of the challenged provisions and awarded fees to the City of Bel-levue for dissolving a temporary restraining order. The City of Bellevue (Appellant) appealed and the Respondents cross-appealed. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for a determination of attorneys’ fees.
STATEMENT…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by168 opinions
- In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Clark v. City of LakewoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Pap's A.M. v. City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.