Legal Opinion

Hillis v. State, Dept. of Ecology

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1997No. 63399-1PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

932 P.2d 139 (1997)

131 Wash.2d 373

Larry HILLIS and Veralene Hillis, husband and wife, Respondents,

v.

STATE of Washington, DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; Mary Riveland, Director of the Department of Ecology; and Pat Spurgin, Central Regional Director of the Department of Ecology, Appellants.

No. 63399-1.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued October 24, 1996.

Decided March 6, 1997.

Cairncross & Hempelmann, P.S., Terrance I. Danysh, Patrick D. Brown, Seattle, amicus curiae on behalf of Coordinated Appellate Group.

Christine Gregoire, Attorney General, Jay J. Manning, Asst., Mark C. Jobson, Asst.,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Rettkowski v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Carrick v. LockeWashington Supreme Court · 1994

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of Tacoma Department of FinancingWashington Supreme Court · 2000

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API