Legal Opinion

Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Etc. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1908No. L.A. No. 1935PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit to recover license taxes imposed by an ordinance of the city of Los Angeles. The clause relating to defendant is as follows: —

"For every person, firm or corporation conducting, managing, or carrying on the business of manufacturing, selling, distributing, or furnishing gas for light, heat, or power, $100 per month."

The defendant claims that this clause of the ordinance is unconstitutional and void. The particular reason advanced in support of this claim is that the same sum is imposed upon every person, firm, or corporation, regardless of the extent, amount, or value of the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People v. McCreeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Ex Parte BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Town of Santa Monica v. GuidingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  5. City of Sonora v. CurtinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kirkwood v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. City & County of San Francisco v. Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Salt Lake City v. Christensen Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Brunton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Franklin v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API