Legal Opinion

Bydalek v. Brines

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 2000No. 23264PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.

In a non-jury case, the trial court entered a money judgment for “Defendants” on two of their counterclaims against Bobbi Bydalek (“Bydalek”). 1 Barbara and David Meeker (“Meekers”), who were ordered joined as parties in this litigation, appeal from that judgment. Meekers’ first point has three parts, i.e., that reversible error occurred when the trial court denied Meekers’ requests (1) for a continuance, (2) to be excluded from the trial of Defendants’ cross-claims against Bydalek, and (3) for a jury. Meekers’ second point maintains that real estate documents at issue…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Rodriguez v. General Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Alack v. Vic Tanny International of Missouri, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  4. Smith v. Inter-County Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  5. Home Trust Co. v. JosephsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. R.J.S. Security, Inc. v. Command Security Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Midland Property Partners, LLC v. WatkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Rathbun v. Cato Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Yerington v. La-Z-Boy, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. In the Interest of P.D.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API