Alack v. Vic Tanny International of Missouri, Inc.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Justice.
Plaintiff was injured while using health club facilities. He had signed a two-page, seventeen-paragraph “Retail Installment Contract” containing a general exculpatory clause. The clause, however, did not expressly release the health club from injuries resulting from its own negligence. The trial court ruled that the exculpatory clause did not bar plaintiffs negligence action as a matter of law, but the trial court allowed the contract as evidence and submitted the issue to the jury as a matter of fact. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in the amount of $17,000.
We hold…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Page Petroleum, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
- Gross v. SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Hoover's Dairy, Inc. v. Mid-America Dairymen, Inc./Special Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- Rodriguez v. General Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Jones v. DresselSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Lopez v. Three Rivers Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Joan Roe v. St. Louis UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Tayar v. Camelback Ski Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Malan Realty Investors, Inc. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Adloo v. H.T. Brown Real Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.