Legal Opinion

Yerington v. La-Z-Boy, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 2004No. 25572PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.

The dispositive question here is whether a “Stipulation For Compromise Settlement,” signed by a workers’ compensation claimant (“Plaintiff’) and his employer (“La-Z-Boy”), clearly and unambiguously included and settled Plaintiffs section 287.780 civil suit against La-Z-Boy for retaliatory discharge. 1 The trial court found the stipulation for compromise settlement to be unambiguous; consequently, it refused to consider Plaintiff’s parol evidence that the parties never intended the compromise settlement to have that effect and dismissed Plaintiffs civil suit against…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dean Humphrey v. Sequentia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. Graham v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Purcell Tire & Rubber Co. v. Executive Beechcraft, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  4. Boswell v. Steel Haulers, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Bydalek v. BrinesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jackson County v. McClain Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Building Erection Services Co. v. Plastic Sales & Mfg. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Nayereh Sahrapour v. LesRon, LLC and Shaw Centre, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Dorsch v. Family Medicine, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Stokes v. National Presto Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API