Rodriguez v. General Accident Insurance Co. of America

ROBERTSON, Judge.

This case involves the underinsured motorist coverage of an automobile insurance contract. Appellants, Gail and Matías Rodriguez, appeal the entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, General Accident Insurance Company of America (General Accident), claiming that the under-insured motorist coverage of the insurance contract between the parties is ambiguous. Relying on that ambiguity, the Rodri-guezes urge that this Court should apply an “objective reasonable expectation” standard to find that their underinsured motorist coverage is excess coverage and that they are…